Fuel Optimization of a Cement Industry, Case Study

Abstract/Description

The Portland Cement manufacturing required energy to run the plant and kiln for manufacturing cement clinker. Due to the non-availability of natural gas, cement manufacturers were forced to investigate alternative fuels which are cheaper, easily available and had a lower environmental impact. Currently, cement manufacturers are using rice husk, Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Coal and furnace oil as alternative sources of fuel. This paper aims to identify the best alternative energy source used in cement kilns. The scope of the paper remains within the kiln energy requirements. The linear programming model is used to minimize the energy cost of the kiln requirements amongst the alternative energy source considering the calorific value, availability per day and plant capacity. The finding of this paper suggests that coal will be the best alternative amongst all the four alternatives available at the quoted cost but due to plant processing limitations, the MSW can be mixed in some content as well. The limitation of the study is toward cost only, the environmental impact of different fuel type emissions is not part of this study.

Track

Management

Session Number/Theme

3D

Session Chair

Dr. Rameez Khalid; Dr. Muhammad Imran

Start Date/Time

27-5-2023 2:30 PM

End Date/Time

27-5-2023 4:30 AM

Location

G-13, AMAN CED, Ground Floor

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
May 27th, 2:30 PM May 27th, 4:30 AM

Fuel Optimization of a Cement Industry, Case Study

G-13, AMAN CED, Ground Floor

The Portland Cement manufacturing required energy to run the plant and kiln for manufacturing cement clinker. Due to the non-availability of natural gas, cement manufacturers were forced to investigate alternative fuels which are cheaper, easily available and had a lower environmental impact. Currently, cement manufacturers are using rice husk, Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Coal and furnace oil as alternative sources of fuel. This paper aims to identify the best alternative energy source used in cement kilns. The scope of the paper remains within the kiln energy requirements. The linear programming model is used to minimize the energy cost of the kiln requirements amongst the alternative energy source considering the calorific value, availability per day and plant capacity. The finding of this paper suggests that coal will be the best alternative amongst all the four alternatives available at the quoted cost but due to plant processing limitations, the MSW can be mixed in some content as well. The limitation of the study is toward cost only, the environmental impact of different fuel type emissions is not part of this study.