Abstract/Description
Today, the exponentially emergent requirements for high performance communication systems operating in noisy environments arise the need of high data rate with error free communication. Due to this reason, design of channel encoders becomes critical and a performance metric is required to qualify encoder for optimized solution. In this paper, we present two encoding techniques i.e. Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) and Turbo encoder. These techniques are evaluated on the basis of FPGA resource utilization and power consumption. Post PAR simulation results show that Low Density Parity Check encoder is more efficient in terms of through put, resource utilization and power consumption than Turbo encoder.
Keywords
Parity check codes, Decoding, Turbo codes, Hardware, Systematic
Location
Room C5
Session Theme
Application of ICT
Session Type
Other
Session Chair
Dr. Arshad Siddiqi
Start Date
24-7-2011 1:00 PM
End Date
24-7-2011 1:20 PM
Recommended Citation
Qazi, S. A., & Kahkashan, S. (2011). Application of ICT: A comparative analysis of power and device utilization of LDPC and Turbo encoders. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies. Retrieved from https://ir.iba.edu.pk/icict/2011/2011/52
Application of ICT: A comparative analysis of power and device utilization of LDPC and Turbo encoders
Room C5
Today, the exponentially emergent requirements for high performance communication systems operating in noisy environments arise the need of high data rate with error free communication. Due to this reason, design of channel encoders becomes critical and a performance metric is required to qualify encoder for optimized solution. In this paper, we present two encoding techniques i.e. Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) and Turbo encoder. These techniques are evaluated on the basis of FPGA resource utilization and power consumption. Post PAR simulation results show that Low Density Parity Check encoder is more efficient in terms of through put, resource utilization and power consumption than Turbo encoder.
