Deep generative models to counter class imbalance: a model-metric mapping with proportion calibration methodology

Author Affiliation

Tahir Q. Syed is Assistant Professor at Institute of Business Administration (IBA), Karachi

Faculty / School

School of Mathematics and Computer Science (SMCS)

Department

Department of Computer Science

Was this content written or created while at IBA?

Yes

Document Type

Article

Source Publication

IEEE Access

ISSN

2169-3536

Disciplines

Computer Sciences | Engineering

Abstract

The most pervasive segment of techniques in managing class imbalance in machine learning are re-sampling-based methods. The emergence of deep generative models for augmenting the size of the under-represented class, prompts one to review the question of the suitability of the model chosen for data augmentation with the metric selected for the-goodness-of classification. This work defines this suitability by using newly-sampled data points from each generative model first to the degree of parity, and studying classification performance on a large set of metrics. We extend the investigation to different proportions of augmented data points for identifying the sensitivity of the metric to the degree of imbalance, leading to the discovery of an optimum proportion against the metric. The models used are GAN, VAE and RBM and the metrics include Precision, Recall, F1-Score, AUC, G-Mean and Balanced Accuracy. We offer a comparison of these models with the established class of data synthesizing counterparts on the aforementioned metrics. Deep generative models outperform the state-of-the-art on 5 metrics on multiple datasets and also comprehensively surpass the baselines. This work thereby recommends the following model-metric mappings: VAE for high Precision and F1-Score, RBM for high Recall and GAN for high AUC, G-Mean and Balanced Accuracy under various recommendedproportions of the minority class.

Indexing Information

HJRS - W Category, Scopus, Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI)

Journal Quality Ranking

Impact Factor: 3.367

Publication Status

Published

Share

COinS